![]() |
|
|
|
News Topics |
Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyRATIONAL STATISTICAL MODELS OF INTUITIVE JUDGMENTS Abstract I will argue that this common assessment of individual judgment is too pessimistic, and that in revising it, we may also come to new insights about the nature of collective intelligence. The talk will focus on two kinds of human judgments: inferences about hidden causes from patterns of coincidences and predictions about the durations or magnitudes of everdyay events. I will show how these judgments can be understood as approximations to sophisticated statistical computations, based on Bayesian inference. I will also consider prediction tasks where individuals' judgments appear suboptimal in a way that is particularly interesting for collective intelligence--judgments that appear to be based on a sparse sample from a Bayesian posterior probability distribution, when an optimal decision maker would average or maximize over the whole distribution. I will offer one hypothesis about where this sampling behavior comes from, and discuss how it can be exploited to design principled mechanisms of collective intelligence that can approximate full Bayesian posterior predictive distributions to arbitrarily high accuracy. This is joint work with Tom Griffiths, UC Berkeley. Speaker bio .
|
The MIT Center for Collective Intelligence:
|
© MIT CCI 2006 | All Rights Reserved |